Updating mache for Polaris
mache is the configuration library used by Polaris (and related
projects like E3SM-Unified and Compass) to determine machine-specific settings,
including module environments and Spack configurations.
During each Polaris release, it is often necessary to:
Add support for new machines
Update Spack environment templates for existing systems
Create release candidates and final versions of
mache
This page outlines the steps for maintaining and updating mache during the
release process.
Repo Location
When to Update mache
You should update mache when:
A supported machine has changed modules or compilers
New machines are being targeted for deployment
Spack YAML templates fall out of sync with system configurations
You need to test new combinations of compiler + MPI + module environments
Each change should be tested by deploying a release candidate of Polaris.
Key Tasks
1. Update config options
Each HPC machine supported by Polaris has a
config file in mache.
These config options control the default deployment behavior, including the
Unix group that the environment will belong to, the
compiler and mpi library used to build Spack packages by
default, the base_path under which the conda and spack environments as well
as the activation scripts will be installed, and whether that machine will
use E3SM’s version of hdf5, netcdf-c, netcdf-fortran, parallel-netcdf,
etc. or install them from Spack.
2. Edit Spack Templates
Spack environment templates live in:
mache/spack/templates/<machine>_<compiler>_<mpi>.yaml
Edit these files to reflect updated system modules or new toolchains.
If adding a new machine, copy an existing yaml file to use as a template.
Use the utility script to assist: 🔗 utils/update_cime_machine_config.py README
3. Create a Release Candidate
Use the typical GitHub flow:
git checkout -b update-to-1.32.0
# Make changes
# Push branch and open PR
Once the PR is reviewed and merged:
Tag a release candidate (e.g.,
1.32.0rc1)Publish it to conda-forge under
mache_dev(by merging a PR that targets thedevbranch)
This RC will be referenced in the Polaris build process.
4. Finalize the Release
Once testing across all platforms is complete:
Create a final version tag (e.g.,
1.32.0)Always use semantic versioning
Submit a PR to
mache-feedstockto update the recipe (this time targeting themainbranch)Merge once CI passes
Afterward, update Polaris to the final release, as described below.
Updating Polaris to a new mache
Polaris pins one version of mache in deploy/pins.cfg. Two of
Polaris’ files belong to mache and must match that version: deploy.py
and deploy/cli_spec.json. Never edit them by hand. Have the new
mache regenerate them instead. The steps work for a release on
conda-forge, such as 5.3.0, or a release candidate on the mache_dev
label, such as 5.3.0rc1.
From the root of your Polaris branch, make a bootstrap environment with the new
mache:./deploy.py --bootstrap-only --mache-version 5.3.0
For an hour or more after a release is uploaded, this can fail with “No candidates were found for mache”. Pixi finds packages through the channel’s sharded index,
noarch/repodata_shards.msgpack.zstonconda.anaconda.org/conda-forge. It sees the release only once that index has been rebuilt, even though anaconda.org already lists the package.pixi search -c conda-forge 'mache==5.3.0'finds it once the index has it. Meanwhile, you can bootstrap from the release’s tag with--mache-fork E3SM-Project/mache --mache-branch 5.3.0in place of--mache-version.Follow the instructions it prints:
pixi shell -m deploy_tmp/bootstrap_pixi/pixi.toml mache deploy update --software polaris --mache-version 5.3.0 exit
This replaces
deploy.pyanddeploy/cli_spec.jsonwith the versions from the newmache.Set
macheunder[pixi]indeploy/pins.cfgto the new version. Until the pin andmeta.mache_versionindeploy/cli_spec.jsonname the same version,./deploy.pyrefuses to run.Update any other dependencies in
deploy/pins.cfg,deploy/pixi.toml.j2anddeploy/spack.yaml.j2(see Updating Deployment Dependencies and Updating Spack Dependencies).mache deploy updateleaves Polaris’ own deployment files alone:deploy/config.yaml.j2,deploy/pixi.toml.j2,deploy/spack.yaml.j2,deploy/hooks.py,deploy/load.shanddeploy/custom_cli_spec.json. Read the release notes of everymacherelease since the old pin, and the descriptions of the PRs they list. Look for:changes Polaris’ own deployment files need, such as a new Spack variant to request in
deploy/spack.yaml.j2;changes to how hooks are called, or to what a hook may do, which
deploy/hooks.pymust follow;breaking changes that need the shared Spack environments rebuilt, such as a new compiler or module version in a machine’s Spack template. A machine whose shared environments are not rebuilt under the new Polaris version breaks for everyone who loads them;
caveats asking to keep a change out of a release, or out of Polaris, until something else happens, such as Omega or E3SM moving to a new module. If such a change was released anyway, raise it in the version-update PR before deploying.
Review the diff, and commit the regenerated files and the new pins together.
Testing an unreleased mache
To deploy Polaris with a mache branch that has not been released yet,
such as a mache PR that fixes a machine’s Spack template, pass its fork
and branch to ./deploy.py:
./deploy.py --deploy-spack --spack-path <test_spack_path> \
--compiler <compiler...> --mpi <mpi...> \
--mache-fork <org>/mache --mache-branch <branch>
./deploy.py then downloads the bootstrap script from the branch, clones
it, and installs mache from the clone into the Polaris environment. It
skips the check that the pin matches deploy/cli_spec.json, so you can
test a branch before updating Polaris to it. If the branch changes
deploy.py or deploy/cli_spec.json, regenerate them from the branch
first, as above but with --mache-fork and --mache-branch in place of
--mache-version. Leave --mache-version off mache deploy update too,
so it uses the version of the mache it was installed with.
Use a mache branch only for test deployments. Release mache, then
update Polaris to the release as above, before deploying the shared Spack
environments. The Polaris version update testing utility takes the same
flags (Testing a Polaris version update).
Best Practices
Be liberal in what system tools (
tar,CMake, etc.) are defined asbuildable: falsein Spack environments.Regularly sync templates with actual E3SM production configurations
Validate changes via test deployments of Polaris before tagging final versions.
New mache releases will need to be made as needed by any of the downstream repos — currently Polaris, E3SM-Unified, and Compass.
➡ Next: Deploying Spack Environment